User talk:CrashBash

"Ace Attorney Wiki"

- Hello there! You've found the Wright place! Welcome!

Hi! welcome to the ! Thanks for your edit to the Benjamin Woodman page.

Welcome to our wiki, and thank you for your contributions! There's a lot to do around here (no, seriously), so I hope you'll stay with us and make many more improvements.

Please leave a message on my talk page if I can help with anything! -- Capefeather (Talk) 2012-12-11T19:19:08

Goddamnit, de Killer's was a damage animation, wasn't it...?

Well, at least that's sorted now.

Spyromed (talk) 18:33, November 10, 2013 (UTC)

What are you looking for, exactly? I'm trying to avoid being TOO wordy because then the article would just run. You need compression and sucinctness. If you didn't realize I was the one who updated the previous section too. All of the Ace Attorney 4 articles are completely derelict, someone has to step up and actually try to make them readable.

However, I do apologize for ramming that image in the middle of the sentence. You can thank the unclear WYSIWYG editor for that. I think I'll just stick to editing in the raw text form from here onwards.SolidSonicTH (talk) 22:32, November 11, 2013 (UTC)


 * I have no idea what you're talking about in the first part of your statement. It's all very well being all "you need compression and sucinctness", but I could easily say that you need to elaborate. As it is, I find it impossible to tell what it is you're having a go at me about (sorry). But I do understand the frustration of the "visual" editing, which is why I always go for "Source" before doing any edits...and I will agree, some of these articles are pretty derelict...The Stolen Turnabout easily comes to mind. CrashBash (talk) 22:55, November 11, 2013 (UTC)

Aura Blackquill
We're not talking about if it's CONFIRMED or not, but whether characters themgselves reference it.

Sexuality confirmed =/= Characters reference sexaulity.

You don't seem to understand that eliminating ALL references to yaoi also =/= eliminating all yaoi speculation. If something is said in game, which this is first time yaoi is referenced in game, then it deserves to be mentioned. Banning it just because "OH IT'S YAOI, WE DON'T DO THAT HERE" is stupid.


 * It says at the top of the page, "sign your posts". Please do that, because I have no idea who you are. Secondly, when did I say that? I didn't. Only you said it. I was removing it because it didn't say anything specific, which is what you were forcing. There is a difference between confirmation and speculation. CrashBash (talk) 16:41, November 13, 2013 (UTC)

Breakdown Page
Erm... just to clarify, I *was* genuinely apologising. Sorry if that came across as rude...

Spyromed (talk) 15:26, November 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * You did say, and I quote, "That was a pretty stupid mistake to make.", of course it's going to come across as rude...it IS rude. Still, you did apologise, so....CrashBash (talk) 15:29, November 27, 2013 (UTC)

Ah, I see what happened here. No, the mistake I was referring to was my own when I mistakenly moved Valant to the villains section following the logic that he re-arranged the crime scene.

Newman
In answer to your question, I never subscribed to the idea that Robin's revelation was a breakdown. I know we tend to disagree... a bit... on what goes on that page, but it wasn't me. And I answered your question here because I don't want to make a pointless edit just to write that on the notes of the edit.

Spyromed (talk) 20:16, November 28, 2013 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for the edit on Widget. I didn't notice I put the apostrophe there.

GaminGage (talk) 11:18, December 11, 2013 (UTC)GaminGage

Lana Skye edit.
...So, what is about this "work[ed]"? I don't think I'd call it proper writing. Sligneris (talk) 16:24, January 4, 2014 (UTC)


 * It's an edited quote. CrashBash (talk) 16:51, January 4, 2014 (UTC)

Lana's breakdown
"Wrong, there are other animations that are clearly "damage" animations and only occur once. You're taking it too literally."

Please give any example, for that matter. Sligneris (talk) 17:56, January 6, 2014 (UTC)


 * April May crying. It's clearly not a breakdown, though. Conversely, Luke Atmey's breakdown (which obviously is one) occurs AT LEAST three times. CrashBash (talk) 18:01, January 6, 2014 (UTC)


 * Okay, but breakdowns generally have big emotional impact on chacters, concluding a part of a trial. Doesn't Lana Skye finally deciding to tell the truth count as that? Sligneris (talk) 20:09, January 6, 2014 (UTC)


 * Well, no, because if I remember correctly, that's not when she bites her thumb. If I also remember correctly, it's over stupidly quickly, and there's no sudden music change or fade, which virtually all actual breakdowns I've seen have. Of course, it has been a while since I played RFTA, since I really REALLY don't like it, so I could be wrong...but my point still stands. CrashBash (talk) 20:36, January 6, 2014 (UTC)

Track translations
If you are interested, these titles were the closest it could be to the Japanese titles, which, in result means it's pretty much the same. For example, there is clearly "want to" in GS2, GK1 and GK2 name tracks, but you see it in just one. There is also just as clearly "cornering" in GS1, GS4 and GS5. There is also no "coldness" or "lie" in GK1 Pursuit track.

They are what the tracks are really called. The closest it can. But you didn't even bother to check, just went ahead and negated someone else's work, right? True, I did that too. But, for your information, you know...? I checked first. So, until you actually go ahead and check everything with dictionaries, please, shut your damn fingers up. Sligneris (talk) 19:26, January 18, 2014 (UTC)


 * Not the same thing. That is a fan-translation, nothing more. And don't be rude. CrashBash (talk) 19:31, January 18, 2014 (UTC)


 * This wikia, is like a courtroom. Only facts matter. State your counter-argument, take all my sentences into consideration, explain why they are wrong and then we can talk. Sligneris (talk) 19:39, January 18, 2014 (UTC)


 * I do not converse with rude people. CrashBash (talk) 19:40, January 18, 2014 (UTC)

Reminiscence
So, exactly what counterarguments you have against either of the changes now? It's the fact that prefixes are the same, so having them listed separately is a mistake. And mistakes shouldn't be present on the wiki. Sligneris (talk) 20:56, January 18, 2014 (UTC)


 * I'm not the one who wrote them. If you have an issue, ask the person who wrote it, or put it on the talk page. Without being rude, OK? CrashBash (talk) 21:02, January 18, 2014 (UTC)


 * Sorry, but we really cannot afford here to discuss removal of every single mistake on the wiki. While I might wait for response regarding Pursuit, this is something that can't really be argued with, as, as I mentioned, 追憶 and 追憶 are the same, regardless of your opinions. With that fact, we can't put several meanings on it.


 * I don't know the translator, but I know that it's not correct to distinguish the two. It's like we had something like...


 * Phoenix Wright ~ Objection! 2001
 * Phoenix Wright ~ I Disagree! 2001


 * Or...


 * Inform the Truth 2001
 * Tell the Truth 2002
 * Announce the Truth 2004
 * Confess the Truth 2009


 * But it is not the case, right? It has to be removed and please, stop arguing about it. As well as... Don't undo my edits. Just don't. I work hard on checking everything while you just sit here and keep saying "Nope! You can't do it!". Being rude after that is only natural. Sligneris (talk) 21:11, January 18, 2014 (UTC)


 * Considering I wasn't even the first to revert your edits in the first place, something I've already explained, you seem to be very defensive over your opinions. Also, have you not heard of "being the better person"? If you thought I was in the wrong, you should have explained calmly and STAYED calm, not hurling insult after insult like you did. The fact you instead decided to do so means that I find it impossible to take you seriously, and as nothing more than someone who just wants the wikia to look how they want it. Discussion first.
 * And, once again, I did not name those tracks. So don't have a go at me over it. CrashBash (talk) 21:18, January 18, 2014 (UTC)

"No offense, but that comment was really uncalled for. We've already explained what is "wrong" with your statement, no need to be rude about it"
Who's rude? If you value your Wikia being incomplete and faulty, then why would I care to help? In that case it's just not my business anymore so you and your clique can carry on reverting any edits you feel like without even a good reason. It's your life after all. Ha. Besides, you didn't explain anything, at all.


 * We already did. Von Karma did not actually whip Wright, it was meerly an effect. And you are rude....your above comment shows that. You went out of your way to comment on MY page, instead of continuing it on YOURS, as you should have done. Also, please sign your posts. It tells you how at the top. CrashBash (talk) 17:11, January 28, 2014 (UTC)


 * No, you didn't. And how exactly do you make a whip sound effect on someone before even being in the room, UH? ...I know how to sign my posts. I just thought it was useless because you'd knew who's talking to you, no need to act like it's my first time on a Wikia. And like I said, since you value your Wikia being incomplete and faulty, I don't really «want to be part of your lil' Wikia» ...And yes, I will comment on "YOURS" if you insist on keeping mine dirty. I don't want to talk to -any of- you. Do you understand, finally? jeandeve (talk) 01:07, January 29, 2014 (UTC)


 * Did you not read what I just said? Von Karma DIDN'T whip Wright...it doesn't show the whip hitting Wright, it shows the whip hitting a black screen. If you think about it, that means it could be hitting anything....maybe even the courtroom door for all we know. Basically, she whips something, but we don't know WHAT it is.
 * NOW do you understand why what you're saying can't be added? Since we don't know or indeed see what Von Karma actually whipped, we can't assume it was Wright, therefore it's not an "error". Now please, calm down and be more mature about this. And, again, this is not my wikia, it is run by "CapeFeather", and I wasn't the only one who deleted your claim in the first place. All I did was give you a caution about your behaviour, which came across as insultive. Now, do you understand the problem? Will you please calm down? CrashBash (talk) 08:02, January 29, 2014 (UTC)

Please.
I'm defending my privacy. From you. You're invading it. I'll leave when you'll stop invading it. That's all.


 * I'm sorry, but the rules clearly state you're not allowed to delete your own talk page whether you like it or not, and I don't need to be an admin to have to tell you that. It's exactly the same on every single wikia I've ever been on, and so you know, I've been a moderator of none of them. So...sorry, but them's the rules. I didn't make them, I just follow them. Nothing to do with "invasion of privacy".
 * Also, no offense, but I can't understand why you're so insistent on having your page deleted in the first place. Just because you got a minor caution? We all make mistakes...it's what makes us human. The important thing is that we learn from them. If you REALLY want to leave, then do so. And if you really want to have your page deleted, talk to CapeFeather. He's the admin.
 * If you are going to reply to this, please do not launch a bombshell at me. That does not help your cause. And, once again, you do need to sign your name. CrashBash (talk) 19:15, January 29, 2014 (UTC)

Please help.
I'm sorry to burden you further, but I need your help. I want out of this war. I understand my pettiness may have gone overboard and maybe it won't be so bad. I could halp improve it to how Slig sees fit. But the problem is. I started it. I admit it. Now it seems like I'm in far to deep to redeem myself. If I keep going I'll be hated and shamed (Of which i deserve) but If I give up now... then I'm just a whiny kid. PLease point mw in the right direction. Again so sorry i know it's late for you.Franzyfan1998 (talk) 01:36, June 23, 2014 (UTC)

Franzyfan
Really, that last message of yours on the timeline's talkpage wasn't necessary - I'm not really going to respond to their posts on that page anymore anyway, since my argument still seems to stand there.

On the other hand, I didn't really hear your own say on the matter, I think. Do you think establishing Capcom's year reference was useful and that the changes I propose are a good idea? - Sligneris (talk) 21:47, June 30, 2014 (UTC)


 * Less of the rudeness, please, you know I don't like that. And I refuse to say anything until you two act more maturely and stop arguing with each other. CrashBash (talk) 22:06, June 30, 2014 (UTC)


 * ...How is nervous laugh rude? .-. - Sligneris (talk) 22:25, June 30, 2014 (UTC)


 * Because I can't tell it's a nervous laugh, and seriously, cut the emoticons, it doesn't work on a wikia. CrashBash (talk) 22:40, June 30, 2014 (UTC)


 * Jeez, let the people type the way they want... It's not like it's a main article, or anything... - Sligneris (talk) 23:23, June 30, 2014 (UTC)


 * Fine, but lessen it at least, and please, can you and Franzyfan start behaving more maturely towards each other? I don't care who "started" it. CrashBash (talk) 23:29, June 30, 2014 (UTC)


 * I don't really care who started it either. All I really want is to improve this wiki's quality and accuracy - Sligneris (talk) 23:44, June 30, 2014 (UTC)

Adrian whipped
Alright, since you said you have your sources, could I ask you for an exact line and information about when exactly it is said...?