| Juror 3 (stereoscope fan) |
Image Gallery | Sprite Gallery |
| We need more pieces to finish this puzzle. | |
|---|---|
|
This article is under construction. While it is not short, it still needs expansion as outlined in the manual of style. The article most likely needs expansion near the end of the tagged section or sections. |
An unnamed stereoscope-obsessed young man was Juror 3 in the trial of Gina Lestrade for the murder of Pop Windibank and assault of Herlock Sholmes.
Lestrade's trial[]
- Main article: The Adventure of the Unspeakable Story
As part of Lestrade's jury for her trial.
When Barok van Zieks presented a photo taken by the pawn shop's surveillance camera showing Lestrade pointing a gun at a shocked Windibank, Juror 3 was convinced with the rest of the jury to vote Lestrade guilty, as he felt the picture was clear.
During defense attorney Ryunosuke Naruhodo's closing argument, Juror 3 angrily interjected when Juror 5 stated that she thought stereoscopes are useless, instead claiming that he believed that they were the future. Juror 3 said that a stereoscope can be used to find differences between two photographs and was delighted to be able to teach the court about stereoscopy. Naruhodo subsequently used stereoscopy to view photos taken at 1:00 a.m. and 1:30 a.m. of the pawn shop counter, which revealed that some objects had been moved, thereby proving that Ringo and Nash Skulkin had tampered with items in the shop and them are hiding it in their testimony. This new outcome caused him and his fellow jurors, Jurors No. 4 and 5 to vote not guilty, allowing the trial to resume.
During Van Zieks' convincing argument, him and the rest of the jury voted guilty again because of Gina's past history and how Naruhudo's explanation is somewhat flawed. After the third bullet was found, the summation examination was put into hold to favor and question the Skulkin Brothers about the sudden revelation. During Naruhudo's convincing rebuttal and explanation, he, Juror No. 1, Juror No. 2 and Juror No. 6 voted Not Guilty because he is far believed by the words of the defense and continuing the trial once again.
Personality[]
Juror 3 is obsessed with stereoscopes, becoming angry when Juror 5 insulted them. However, this obsession proved invaluable to Naruhodo, as it allowed him to easily compare two photographs. This obsession appears again when Naruhudo caught the bug at last when comparing two photographs again by using a stereoscope.