|Ace Attorney Wiki|
|Hello there! You've found the Wright place! Welcome!|
Hi! welcome to the Ace Attorney Wiki! Thanks for your edit to the Breakdown page.
Welcome to our wiki, and thank you for your contributions! There's a lot to do around here (no, seriously), so I hope you'll stay with us and make many more improvements.
You may have seen our welcome message when you first visited the site. If you need to refer to it again, it is located here. The pages mentioned there are all highly useful, especially the recent changes page, which allows you to see what other people are editing right this minute, including what they are discussing on talk pages. Another great stop is our things to do page, which lists areas that could use your help. Finally, the Community Portal contains links to other large Ace Attorney websites, as well as general advice on editing.
Here is the reason: it's because Nahyuta was "breaking free" from Ga'ran control. It's look like a Breakdown because he's now becaom a diffrent person and react in way that reveled his true idenity.Yuval4436
- That's not a breakdown, though, is it, or anything even close to one. This sort of thing is not unique to Nahyuta, and we don't mention them. Also, please sign your name properly. CrashBash (talk) 16:01, September 17, 2016 (UTC)
- Also, I would advise you either slow down whilst you type or use a spellchecker. You do make a few mistakes whilst typing. CrashBash (talk) 17:41, September 23, 2016 (UTC)
When I say "slow down"...
...I literally mean slow down when you're typing. You make a lot of spelling mistakes when you write, such as unfourtnetly (unfortunately), exmanation (examination), Mnaferd (Manfred) and Gara'n (Ga'ran). Now, the former two, I could understand if this was a language gap (I.E. English wasn't your first language), but the latter two, which are names and used in the article several times, really do give the impression you're rushing to get it all out. If you slowed down and read over what you wrote, you wouldn't make these mistakes. CrashBash (talk) 19:58, September 27, 2016 (UTC)
- And you're STILL not listening to what I say. You write "When Maya first appear, his first line his..." which is clearly wrong. It should be "When Maya first appears, her first line is..." This is why I keep telling you to slow down and use an English spellchecker. Also, it should be "Fey", not "Maya", because we always use last names unless there's another character with the same last name involved. CrashBash (talk) 13:31, September 30, 2016 (UTC)
- I am a human. I'm doing mistakes and I pretty sure you did some mistakes in this wiki. So can you please shut up and let me enjoy editing the wiki?! yuval4436 17:06, September 30, 2016 (Israel)
- Or, alternatively, you could take what I say into consideration. I'm not trying to be mean, but you're not showing any signs of actually listening to what I say, and all I've been trying to give you is helpful advice. Also, you should add another colon for ease of reading, just saying. CrashBash (talk) 21:03, September 30, 2016 (UTC)
- A human like you and me would take this into consideration. Like he said, you're making mistakes with your spelling. 19:42, September 30, 2016 (UTC)
- If it happens once or twice, then yes, it can definitely be taken as mere mistakes. But almost all of your edits have had some sort of spelling or grammar error. You very well should consider slowing down and check for mistakes. It certainly wouldn't hurt to consider this. TaylorHyuuga (talk) 08:20, October 1, 2016 (UTC)
That was uncalled for and you know it
"As an annoying person told me this..." Is this how you constantly treat people who give you constructive criticism? The only annoying person here is you, because you refuse to listen to what other people say when we're only trying to help you. Never write stuff like that again. CrashBash (talk) 17:05, October 1, 2016 (UTC)
Well I mean, there's no reason to be too harsh. I do recommend checking over your edits for typos, because you do seem to show a better grasp of spelling in edit summaries and talk pages for some reason. I also recommend generally making more of an effort into figuring out how certain things work and how certain terms are used in this wiki, especially for weird subjective concepts like breakdowns. In some cases I do see where you're coming from, like with breakdowns and the Dai-Long Lang thing, but we could all use a reminder every now and then that this is a collaboration, so there will be disagreements and inconsistencies. capefeather (talk) 19:49, October 1, 2016 (UTC)
This is the reason why I keep reverting your edit regarding Klavier's cut-in sprite. The line as it stands says, and I quote, "Simon is the only returning attorney character (including Klavier Gavin) in Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney: Spirit of Justice to lack a new cross-examination cut-in sprite." This is true, he is literally the only one to lack one - Phoenix, Apollo, Athena and Edgeworth all have a new one...and yes, so does Klavier. That's what is meant by the bit in brackets...he is being included with the returning characters that DO have a new sprite. The reason the note is there is because he's not in the main game/canon story, only a bonus case. CrashBash (talk) 17:43, October 2, 2016 (UTC)
- Does it really matter if this sprite is in the main story or not? Even if the DLC is not canon, it doesn't mean Klavier doesn't have this sprite. But you know what? I changed the page a little so that line stands. Tell me if this is better. yuval4436 20:56, October 2, 2016 (Israel)
- No, because the way you've worded it clearly implies that Klavier doesn't have a new sprite, even though he clearly does. You wrote the opposite of what you're saying. Also, nobody is saying that Klavier doesn't have a new sprite, you are only assuming that. As I already said, the trivia point clearly acknowledges that Klavier has a new sprite, because it lists him with the "other" returning characters that do have a new sprite. This is why you need to read what people say. CrashBash (talk) 18:27, October 2, 2016 (UTC)
I will say this to you one more time - "Simon is the only returning attorney character (including Klavier Gavin) in Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney: Spirit of Justice to lack a new cross-examination cut-in sprite." is correct because it clearly says that Simon is the only returning attorney character to lack a new cross-examination cut-in sprite. Nowhere does it say that Klavier lacks one. By saying (including Klavier Gavin), it clearly acknowledges him amongst the others, meaning that he does also have a new sprite, even though it's in a non-canon case. CrashBash (talk) 18:34, October 2, 2016 (UTC)
- Oh, now I am understanding what it's mean. You see, when I first saw this, I thought it ment that the "including Klavier Gavin" line mean the it is including Klavier that he DOESN'T have a cut-in sprite. Sorry for the misunderstanding. I'm cool with it now. Apology accepted? yuval4436 21:56, October 2, 2016 (Israel)
It wasn't the case of slowing down. I just forgot how do say and write the word. There is a diffrence. yuval4436 13:46, October 7,2016 (Israel)
Something tells me English wasn't your first language.--User:ChrAplab 17:35, October 7, 2016 (UTC)